
When I think of Impz…this picture immediately comes to mind
Anime has been around for over 100 years, with the earliest known Japanese animation produced in 1907. It consisted of a mere fifty frames drawn on a strip of celluloid and lasted approximately 3 seconds. Nowadays, the frame rate per episode tends to measure in the thousands, with some series, such as Gurren Lagann, requiring over 22,000 frames of animation for a single episode. While newer technology is creating more and more ways to expand the visual characteristics of anime, the problem many up and coming writers face lies in producing new and original ideas. However, the question arises: What is considered to be original anymore?
The Header Image is in no way related to the rest of this entry, haha
Before I start my little rant, I would like to apologize if it’s a bit disorganized. A lot of stuff that I think about is hard for me to place in text format so it may be a bit confusing for some readers. I’ve tried my best to provide a structured ramble but it could get ugly 0_0. Proceed with Caution!
After being around for years and years, it’s no wonder that the task of creating something original has become damn near impossible. Everywhere you look, an idea has either been used before, or is so ridiculously outlandish that no one would watch it. Of course, there are exceptions like always, with Moyashimon being a choice example. Moyashimon basically tells the story of a young man who interacts with bacteria daily, leading to many comical scenarios. When I had first heard of this series, I remember thinking about how the hell the Mangaka came up with such an idea. I mean, come on, bacteria? That’s possibly the last thing I would’ve thought an anime would have been about. This brings me to my next point. Eventually how deep will writers have to wrack their brains before something new pops out?

I honestly can’t think of a caption that expresses the awesomeness of this image in words
With the immense popularity of accepted genres of anime, such as Harem, wouldn’t writers instead have more success in expanding these already standardized concepts rather than attempting new ideas? This 2007/2008 Winter Season of Anime is a noteworthy example of the recycling and reusage of established themes and concepts. Touted by many bloggers as one of the most unoriginal and unappealing seasons of anime to date, nearly half of the “new” series turned out to be either a harem or a sequel to an already existing series. Heck, one of the series, They are My Noble Masters, is possibly one of the most pointless animes ever made in my opinion. Yet, still many people watch it and enjoy it, because of how it serves up every possible fetish a man could ever have. Another series, Shigofumi, has been noted as having many similar characteristics and concepts as a previous Anime, Shinigami no Ballad, and H2O has already been dubbed by many to be another Myself; Yourself. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that we can already cast them off as being mere repeats. Shigofumi has been touted by many to have the potential to become a masterpiece and after a lackluster start, H2O has begun to show signs of growing into something worth watching. This proves that originality isn’t a requirement in order for something to be enjoyable. Hell, Gundam has been around since the 70s and is still churning out new series.
Usually nowadays, writers weave together existing concepts and churn out something that they call their own. Even when a new anime is considered to be new and innovative, more often than not, it contains elements that have been used before. However, can anything even be defined as an original product? Many anime, such as Minami-ke Perhaps you could say that Minami-ke has some traits of originality in being that its very fresh in terms of interactions between the characters, but there is hardly any groundbreaking material to be found in Minami-ke. If Minami-ke isn’t labeled as something original, then how unique or cutting edge does an anime have to be in order for it to gain that distinction? Perhaps there is a fine line that a series walks across, sometimes almost falling into repetitiveness but somehow managing to balance itself so that it can be christened as something truly original.
I often find myself comparing two animes that from a glance, look poles apart, but in fact contain parallels in terms of not only plot but even the character designs themselves. This sparks the question of: Will there ever be a limit to how many different ways something can be drawn? For male characters, there is already a stereotypical male design given to the protagonist for many series. Often, if we took a character out from one series and replaced it with another, the difference in the character’s personality and look contain little distinction. Originality isn’t just becoming harder and harder to find in terms of plot, even designs for characters are becoming more and more elaborately drawn just so the illustrator can call their characters their “own”. Repetitiveness is slowly becoming a factor in drawings as well, whether we realize it or not.

Stereotypical Asian Male: Keitaro Urashima
I am guessing that many of you reading this are already thinking about lots of original anime or manga that you can splatter the comments section with in order to counterpoint this post. I’m not necessarily trying to say anime is becoming unoriginal though. I’m just wondering if there is a way to define originality so that it can we can say that a series is truly original. Ze End~
Browse Timeline
- « Happy Chinese New Year from the crew of T.H.A.T Anime Blog
- » Frustrated at tests and why Winter 2007/2008 really got on my nerves…more shoujo series pls!
Comments (16)
First off, Lady Shiki reminds you of Impz? Wouldn’t Wriggle fit more into the role… (shuts up before she gets killed)
As for the topic, I don’t think it’s a matter of a lack of originality among animation studios (and the source material they use), but the fact that the same tired formulas we bemoan, well, *work*. It’s important to remember that, at their core, animation studios and manga publishers are still businesses.
Myssa Rei added these pithy words on Feb 06 08 at 9:55 pmShort answer: Originality is within the anime you guys aren’t plastering all over your blogs. Naked chicks and cheap fanservice tend to do that.
Long answer: I work the “graveyard shift” at my job as a security officer. Which is ironically fitting since a funeral begets a graveyard. Originality is DEAD.
Considering that the late-light anime is made for the purpose of “comforting losers and telling them that it’s gonna be alright,” it’s no surprise. Every situation that leads to a guy getting smacked by a girl; every time said guy gets beatened down every time he tries to stand up…
It’s amazing how, in the US, Naruto is disgustingly popular because some retarded punk ninja DARED to stand up. And this causes all the retards to stand up (and risk eternal ridicule; I wonder if they care about that risk). This is much like when, in “Train Man,” an otaku saved a woman and managed to gain a girlfriend; causing all the real otaku to come from out of their bubbles in the hopes of scoring. The results were not pretty.
But yeah. Originality may even mean making the simple decision of altering the cliche; ducking from the hand that’s about to slap you, locking the door to the (bath)room, keeping Makoto (from School Days) alive so he can REALLY… HELL. Not make Makoto such a womanizing wuss and just do that one girl. Maybe two for dramatic effects.
Or is that too much of a ratings failure in Japan to create male leads in an all-female show; one where said male lead mans the freak up.
I mean… The anime that rules in Japan BOMBS in the West. No matter what this or that blog or forum says. There’s a reasong that this “expensive hobby for broke people” is a niche market.
Slightly Bald Wizard added these pithy words on Feb 06 08 at 10:10 pmThere is an early mover advantage to originality. As a medium gets popular, the things that worked initially overshadow the things that had lesser potential. As the medium matures, there is a move towards specialization and niches in order to extract greater value by being more original in the niche than anyone else. This is as true of anime and manga as it is for classical music or computer algorithms.
Also, general storytelling hasn’t changed that much when it comes to human relationships. Most of the originality today is nothing more than small variations on themes that have been around thousands, perhaps millions, of years.
Anime and manga’s biggest successes for originality have come from embracing many of the sci-fi and fantasy concepts. By doing so they can explore philosophical points that cannot be explored by sticking to the “here and now” of gritty reality.
The real death of originality comes much from the fact that people are happier and more comfortable when they have a frame of reference that matches their own. The most popular shows almost always tend to have situations and settings that parallel ones that are common today. This is particularly true for romance and social interactions, which are often the glue that allows a truly “out there” sci-fi or fantasy to connect with the audience.
I don’t think originality is dead so much as hidden behind the limitations of the medium and social mores. I think it will take either a major technological advance or a major change in our social structure before we see anything we consider “original” again - even though a historian may not find it that original.
kdp added these pithy words on Feb 06 08 at 10:52 pmI wouldn’t worry about originality personally. Derivations are more than entertaining enough to me.
Also, it typically isn’t about originality other than the execution in solid writing, direction and the characters themselves.
Even if a character may seem like a carbon copy on paper, it doesn’t mean that they’re the same. You can’t really compare someone like Heero in Gundam Wing to Setsuna in Gundam 00 even if they do come across as similar characters. Since their actual characters are quite different in their ideologies and how they carry themselves.
Shippoyasha added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 12:36 amImpz reminds you of Sikieiki? The mind, it boggles.
Errr… … …
Psychonauts. Totally awesome game. Lousy sales until it was up on Steam.
Similarities? Go draw them yourself.
DrmChsr0 added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 3:11 am“Impz reminds you of Sikieiki? The mind, it boggles.”
Perhaps Impz has the ability to send his writers to blog hell?
As long as you place spins that haven’t been seen before on concepts that have, I consider that spin to be original, though this is spotty at best. :3
TheBigN added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 7:28 amMmmmmm he’s saying it reminds him of Impz because Impz loves green haired lolis, not that Impz looks like that.
As for originality, it’s a pretty subjective standard. The vast majority of media today contains large parts of things that have been done in the past, whether you notice it or not. This is especially true in comedy where familiarity is what makes a lot of it funny. The fact is that true originality requires a genius, and only a miniscule fraction of the population is capable of something like that. Couple that with the fact that the anime industry doesn’t pay much and is risk averse, and you find shows that are similar in nature. The point is that it’s not something that’s new, it’s always been like that.
People have been saying originality is dead for as long as there has been media. In today’s anime world the people that say originality is dead are those that don’t like the predominant genres out there. If you don’t like moe or harem shows you will probably say they are all crappy copies. However, fans of the genre can tell the differences and appreciate all of the shows. You can categorize True Tears and Kimiaru as moe harem shows, but they are completely and utterly different. The fact that there are pretty girls and one male lead does not mean it is not different and entertaining.
If one doesn’t like mecha they can say that wow every show is a clone of Eva or Gundam First-they are unoriginal and crappy. So be careful before you make broad statements that originality is dead especially when you cite Naruto of all things as something that should be looked upon as a good example.
Calawain added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 3:19 pmMy latin teacher is always saying that there are no new plots. And that’s when were translating something wicked old, like Ovid.
Still I like anime. I would admit that some shows aren’t the most original thing I’ve ever seen, but there’s a certain comfort to that. And to say nothing is new isnt really true either.
perfidiouspal added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 5:57 pmMan, you people write a lot haha.
@Myssa: Yeah, I hadn’t thought about business being a factor as to why nothing new seems to be coming out recently. Reminds me of my previous post on Anime Merchandise and how much more guy-oriented merchandise there is than girls. It’s still kind of depressing though, on how money and society basically run our lives, regardless of how much we struggle against them.
@SBWizard: I don’t necessarily believe that Originality is dead. I feel that there are still some gems there such as Death Note that can be considered to be honestly original. However, I think that most new manga/anime that is being produced just plays to the masses because it’s what we like. If you’ve been eating a delicious cheeseburger for everyday of your life and all of a sudden you’re presented with an Avocado Burger, wouldn’t you stick with the cheeseburger? Of course, if you’re a vegetarian, I am very sorry for using this example, but I kind of think that it may not be the problem of Mangakas not trying to be original but the problem of the media feeding off of accepted ideas. I agree with your cliche idea though. So many storylines nowadays are so repetitive that I can call the plot premise before the anime even starts.
@kdp: Yeah, I know what you mean by the expansion of sci-fi and fantasy concepts. Although there’s so many different types of fantastical animes, basically in the end they’re all similar in one way or other. But could you argue the point that right from the first romance anime or the first comedy anime etc. that future shows to come wouldn’t be able to call themselves original? Because of the limited nature of the human language, regardless of how hard we try, we tend to fall into a cycle of utilised words, motifs, etc. Can we even call the small variations on story originality?
@Shippo: Yeah, I also enjoy anime that isn’t necessarily groundbreaking. The character originality concept interests me though. Since each character in an anime is different from any other character, would that mean that one could argue that all anime’s can be considered original? I don’t think so, but it would be intriguing to see someone argue this point.
@Drm: I didn’t even know the loli’s name haha. I just found it on Danbooru ;D. Psychonauts kind of reminds me of Jak and Daxter mixed in with Sly Cooper from the description. Of course, I’ve never played so I may be completely wrong. Also, similarities between what? Green Loli and Raz 0_0?
@BigN: Haha, because of Impzie’s fascination with green loli’s, I always imagine him as a King Loli sitting on his throne
that rules over all us underlings. I think that what you feel to be original is basically the generalized thinking amongst most anime viewers. However, how much of a spin do you think an anime needs to be original. Can it be just a simple switch of gender roles such as in Lovely Complex, or does it take something more?
Arrgh Calawain. Your post is so long haha. I’ll post again later but I’ve already spent like an hour thinking about the previous responses X_X.
Igunis added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 6:07 pmwhat is originality?
being original, having original ideas. not being a copycat.
rollchan added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 7:05 pm*REPENT!*
Definitely having a hard time visualizing Impz as the officious and sermon-giving yama. Lady Shiki Eiki is not a force to be trifled with, especially with her grave-marker danmaku!
Back on topic however, what I also forgotten to add about the anime production industry (and indeed, any business these days) is that, while they are probably more than capable of producing or supporting series that are original (or are based on source material that is original), there’s a very large amount of risk involved. It might pay off, but then it might fail terribly, so it’s no wonder that they use themes that they KNOW will work.
Myssa Rei added these pithy words on Feb 07 08 at 9:11 pmIgunis, I think one can argue that most anime characters can be considered ‘original’ depending on their set circumstances. If they go through the same motions and do the same cliche, then there’s no excuse to them being original in any way. But slight differences in interaction between different types of characters tend to make a world of difference as I see it. I wouldn’t say that it’s a matter of the character itself being totally original other than that how they’re used that can give them a feeling of individuality. And what better way to do that than put them in an ensemble cast that play along with eachother ever so slightly than usual? I think that’s key to atleast put a facade of originality in anime. And to me, it works.
Shippoyasha added these pithy words on Feb 08 08 at 12:30 amI might wonder where originality was if I wasn’t working my way through a series where cute aliens are invading Japan to steal its national treasures. I might wonder where originality was if the military defense forces weren’t powerless to stop the cute aliens for fear it might make them look like bullies in the eyes of Japan’s public. I might wonder where originality went if military leaders weren’t enlisting their cute eight year old granddaughters into the ground, air, and sea defenses, to defend Japan against these cute aliens. Of course, this series is from 2002, so maybe there was more originality back then?
Christopher Fritz added these pithy words on Feb 10 08 at 8:57 amYARRRRR
@Perfidious: Man, latin is so damn hard. VERGILS AENEID ARRGH! But I agree with ya. Even if anime became more repetetive in terms of plot, characters, etc. , I feel that I would still enjoy it because of the comfort factor we find in these shows.
@Cal: So what you’re saying is, originality depends on the mind of the viewer? Probably that’s the best reply, but doesn’t that mean that everyone show has the potential to be considered original in terms of this logic?
@Rollchan: Shit…I hadn’t thought of that. Such a genius commentator :O
@Myssa: Honestly, when I pulled up that image, I had no idea it was from a game or whatnot haha. I agree with what you’re saying about the money issue. It’s a shame that we are often hindered by what Society wants rather than what we feel.
@Shippo: Nice response :O. I’m beginning to see a standard for most anime watchers as to what originality is.
@Christopher: What is that anime? I must watch it! And everything was soooooo much better back in the 2002s. I mean, Phish came back from the dead and the First Spider Man movie came out! Now, they’re planning a Spiderman 4 and 5 ;_;.
Igunis added these pithy words on Feb 10 08 at 11:23 amIgunis, the anime is Ground Defense Force! Mao-chan (Wikipedia link). As I understand it, it originates from the mind of Ken Akamatsu (Love Hina), which you’ll no doubt notice when military officer Kagome Mihara walks onto the screen, and you say “That’s Naru Narusegawa!” (Actually, Naru doesn’t show up until a much later episode. No, that’s not a spoiler. Mao-chan is the type of show that doesn’t really have “spoilers” to it.) If the idea of three cute eight years with high voices and repeatative mannerisms (nicely done in both Japanese and English, I must say) doesn’t scare you off, then I recommend buying the series on DVD. It’s four DVDs, and if you can get them during any manner of sale, they can be considerably cheap to buy.
Christopher Fritz added these pithy words on Feb 10 08 at 6:25 pmMy comment was blocked as spam, so if it’s not recovered, the series I mentioned was “Ground Defense Force! Mao-chan”. (I think my Wikipedia link was what marked my comment as spam.)
Christopher Fritz added these pithy words on Feb 10 08 at 6:28 pm
